Re: [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3

[Claudio Matsuoka]

On Sat, 21 May 2005, Stew Benedict wrote:

> Fine by me. We voted against /media and /srv when they were proposed. We
> minimally comply with the lsb package, but we're not using it as intended.
>
> If we would like to move to providing the support in the system, I can
> remove the additions in lsb.

Maybe it's a good time to do so. Back when they were proposed, /media and
/srv seemed strange enough for us not to like it, but I think they're far
more acceptable now. We gain in standards compliance, and it would make
the Conectiva Linux 10 -> Mandriva Linux 2006 upgrade less harder.

Let's see if anyone has restrictions. If it is to be done, it's best
to do it earlier because it will possibly affect other subsystems such
as the installer, supermount and maybe file managers.