Mandrake Linux Archives: cooker@mandrivalinux.org
Mandrake Linux: cooker@mandrivalinux.org
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Claudio Matsuoka
- Subject: Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- Date: 24 May 2005 23:10:04 -0000
On Tue, 24 May 2005, David Walser wrote: > By default /mnt is empty. Things are only added there when certain > things are detected (floppy drives, optical drives, and some other things) > > The fact that the installer automates adding some mount points for you > (which you'd need to do anyway) doesn't seem like a violation. It is, as I see it, system usage of /mnt (i.e. the system chooses or assumes mount points under /mnt, which should be kept free for temporary mounts). If something else is mounted on /mnt, it is likely that certain subsystems may stop working. If, after the installation, the admin decides to use /mnt/xxx for floppies, cdrom or other filesystems, that's ok, but the system can't assume that by default. A valid concern was raised on nonstandard, non-removable media that's mounted by default, such as windows filesystems. I'm not sure where these should be mounted to be both practical and standards-compliant. One possible location would be straight in the root fs, but there are objections on overpopulating it. I've been thinking about keeping /mnt/win_[cde] and declare it as site- specific, since it's a nonstandard directory that would not be available in all machines and no other system tool uses this path. Seems to be the best choice so far... In machines with no windows filesystems on it, which would be the case of servers, /mnt would stay clear. In home desktops with dual-boot, the installer gives a hand to the local admin and places the nonstandard directory there, as a local configuration.
- Replies:
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Vincent Panel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- References:
- [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Claudio Matsuoka
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Claudio Matsuoka
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Stew Benedict
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Vincent Panel
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: Claudio Matsuoka
- [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- From: David Walser
- [Cooker] Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- Prev by Date: Re: [Cooker] Remove Yelp to upgrade Mozilla-Firefox?
- Next by Date: [Cooker] Wiki topic changes (Mandriva Linux Development Community.Main)
- Previous by thread: [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- Next by thread: Re: [Cooker] Re: Cooker filesystem vs FHS 2.3
- Index(es):
Search the archive:
To (un)subscribe from/to the lists:
Fund the Mandriva Linux project
