Mandriva Linux Archives: cooker@mandrivalinux.org
Mandriva Linux: cooker@mandrivalinux.org
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Emmanuel Andry
- Subject: [Cooker] Re: rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- Date: 3 Mar 2007 18:43:52 -0000
Le samedi 03 mars 2007 Ã 19:28 +0100, Frederik Himpe a Ãcrit : > Some time ago, I gave my opinion about the choice of applications installed by > default in a standard KDE install in Mandriva. In this second part, I'm > presenting my opinion about the default Gnome installation, in the hope of > starting a constructive discussion to improve the default Gnome desktop. > > 1. Graphical viewers: The default Gnome installation, contains three different > picture viewers: eog, gthumb and f-spot. > > F-Spot has a rather unique feature set amongst these three (creation of an > organised photo collection), and should remain in the default Gnome install > IMO. > > eog and gthumb are used for similar purposes on the other hand: viewing > individual pictures, and viewing directories of pictures. The first use case, > actually is fullfilled also by F-Spot, the second is not (F-Spot requires you > to import all pictures). So we still need either eog or gthumb. > > In favour of Eog is the fact that it's Gnome's default picture viewer. On the > other hand, for viewing a directory of pictures, gthumb is much handier: it > shows all thumbnails in a nice large overview, and when you double click on a > thumbnail, the picture is shown full screen. Eog tries to show both the > selected picture and the collection at the same time, but this makes that you > have to scroll much more in the collection view. So personally I would vote > for gthumb as default, although I could perfectly understand if eog was > chosen. But please don't install both of them, as that's too much > duplication. > > 2. Digicam importers: we have four programs which can import pictures from a > digital camera: f-spot, flphoto, gthumb and gtkam. flphoto is ugly compared > to native GTK-programs and does not have any added functionality to the other > programs (at the same time it can be moved to contribs and upgraded to > version 1.3). GTKam is also a simple importer without unique features, so no > reason to install it by default. > > My proposal for point 1 and 2: install F-Spot and Gthumb by default, do not > install eog, flphoto and gtkam by default anymore. (PS: I verified after I > have written these two points: this is also what Ubuntu is doing by default). > > 3. Web browsers: We have Epiphany and Firefox in the default install. I think > Mandriva is besides Debian the only big distro installing these two by > default. These two browsers use the same engine, and Epiphany does not have > unique features which do not exist in Firefox. Furthermore Firefox is much > more known. So personally I do not see any reason to install both, it just > clutters the Web Browser menus. (Even when installing both, is it really > necessary to create a seperate menu item for Epiphany's bookmark manager? I > have never seen somebody starting his bookmark manager to start browsing the > web...) > > 4. CD Player applications: We currently have three applications which permit > you to listen to music CDs: gnome-cd, rhythmbox and sound-juicer. Is > gnome-cd-player really still necessary? Rhtymbox could be launched > automatically for audio CDs. At least Ubuntu does not install gnome-cd by > default anymore, just rhythmbox and sound-juicer. > This would mean we would have to split gnome-media package: not a bad idea > IMHO: it would also permit us to not install vumeter anymore, as that > application seems also rather useless. > > 5. gftp: This package is installed by default, but upstream development seems > to have come to a halt, and it does not work very stable. Personally I > experienced often random crashes when using it in the past, and now there is > this blocker bug: http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=29073 > Unfortunately, I don't know of a good GTK-alternative at the moment. Maybe we > don't need a graphical FTP-application in default install? > > 6. We're installing blogtk by default now. This application has not been > updated for two years, and I think it's target public is too limited to > install it by default. This is only useful to people having a supported blog, > and even then I don't think a lot of people really bother using a seperate > program instead of just using the web based administration panel of their > blog. > > 7. cdrdao-gcdmaster: It is a burning application for audio CDs. It seems an > application with an extensive feature set for rather specialized work. Would > not a more simple application like brasero or serpentine be more appropriate? > 1. +1 2. +1 3. +1 4. +1 5. Why not filezilla ? Not gtk based, but made his proof 6. no advice 7. brasero is very easy to use and stable -- Regards, Emmanuel Andry Mandriva Contributor
- Replies:
- Re: [Cooker] Re: rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- From: Frederik Himpe
- Re: [Cooker] Re: rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- References:
- [Cooker] rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- From: Frederik Himpe
- [Cooker] rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- Prev by Date: [Cooker] [Bug 29061] digikam, UNCONFIRMED: Error starting digikam
- Next by Date: [Cooker] [Bug 29088] wengophone, UNCONFIRMED: 2007.1b2free wengophone many crashes
- Previous by thread: [Cooker] rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- Next by thread: Re: [Cooker] Re: rpmsrate discussion [2]: default Gnome desktop
- Index(es):
Search the archive:
To (un)subscribe from/to the lists:
Fund the Mandriva Linux project
