Mandrake Linux Archives: cooker@linux-mandrake.com
Mandrake Linux: cooker@linux-mandrake.com
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: Gwenole Beauchesne
- Subject: Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- Date: 19 Mar 2003 20:06:34 -0000
Hi,
That works only for libraries linked at compile time however, while symlinksWhy people would dlopen() a library themself if the primary goal was supposed to get better performance? Again, the process I described is the way to go. Packages doing otherwise are to be taught the right way.
works also for binaries, and for dynamically loaded libraries.
Moreover, there are two different issues there: a packaging issue (shouldThe former issue is maintainer's. i.e. he should check whether it worth it and the actual gain doing so. The other issue is addressed as I described.
optimisable package contains optimized code) and a system issue (how to
install this code to make it used).
Bye,
Gwenole.
- Replies:
- Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- From: Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- References:
- Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- From: Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Cooker] 9.2 wishlist: urpmi --optimise
- Next by Date: Re: [Cooker] Re: Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- Next by thread: Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 Wishlist (9.2 ??)
- Index(es):
Search the archive:
To (un)subscribe from/to the lists:
Fund the Mandriva Linux project
